Rescuing Baltimore: Help the residents rescue themselves

The absolute wrong way to rescue Baltimore is to throw more money at the problem in the manner sought by Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake. That solution not only creates dependency and smacks of paternalism, but it has also been tried and failed. The answer is a modern expression of an old parable.

Everyone knows the saying ‘Give a hungry man a fish and he’s satisfied for one day; teach him to fish and he’ll no longer go hungry.” Here’s my modern version. “Teach a man to fish and he’ll not only feed himself, but his entire family. Help him buy fishing equipment and he’ll be able to sell what he can’t eat to restaurants, buy a second boat, hire people to catch and clean the fish, hire more people to make the deliveries, keep his books, etc.

Baltimore needs a plan to foster entrepreneurship, not more hand-outs from the State or federal government. Rawlings-Blake did a presser with the Small Business Administration (SBA) that is offering assistance and microloans. That’s a step in the right direction, but one that needs to be multiplied tenfold. The mayor also needs to learn the lessons of the past mistakes, for example when $130 million spent on rehabilitating housing in Baltimore failed to turn around a neighborhood because the people didn’t have jobs to keep up their houses. (See Why Couldn’t $130 million transform one of Baltimore’s poorest places?)

A coalition of colleges, the chamber of commerce, city, and state government should be assembled to provide free entrepreneurship classes and small business support in the worst neighborhoods.

Here’s how that could work. Mary Jones, a licensed beauty technician, attends an introductory workshop where she learns if she wants to start a beauty salon—something she’s always wanted to do, she can get help developing a business plan, and submitting that plan to a microlending agency.

Most small businesses don’t qualify for bank funding and therefore people who want to start a business may never get the chance. Banks can’t fund lawn care firms, beauty salons, or small contractors, etc. not because of redlining or discrimination, but due to structural impediments. They are too big to lend. Microlenders use crowd-sourcing to raise the money, which has the benefit of being democratic as well as keeping down overhead costs.

A microlending agency might receive business plans for one hundred businesses (existing and new) that want loans under $25,000. They notify people willing to invest. Here’s how that works with Kiva where I’ve invested in dozens of businesses all over the world. I decide I have $100 to invest in small businesses. I scan through the list of companies needing a loan and pick four to get $25 each. One of them might be Mary’s beauty salon. She needs $2,500 to rehab the vacant storefront where she’d like to locate her business and $2,500 for equipment. She plans to have four chairs; three for other licensed practitioners each of whom will pay her rent to meet their customers in her salon.

My investment doesn’t even begin to meet her needs, but I post on Facebook that I’ve lent Mary Jones $25 and invite my 500 friends to consider loaning her $25. Say 50 of them think this is something they’d like to do, which raises $1,250, but each of them notifies their FB friends who notify their friends and eventually we have $5,000. Only then does Mary get her loan.

That’s not the end of the story. Mary’s business plan shows that she should be able to start repaying the loan after one month. As she starts repaying her loan, that money goes into the accounts of the two hundred people who financed her. Pretty soon she’s repaid her loan and I can invest my $25 in Joe’s fishing company.

Not all businesses will be funded; not all that get funded will succeed, but enough will to start building an economy that will allow people to fix up their homes, to raise families, buy a cars, go on vacations, etc.

Pretty soon you have a self-supporting, self-sustaining community instead of a dependent one. Which community do you think will have the higher crime rate? Which will deepen the racial divide? Which will attract businesses outside the region to come in to open stores, restaurants, and offices?

Kiva relies on local NGOs to help select and manage their microloans in places like Guatemala and Kenya. In Baltimore there could be more than one microlending agency authorized by the State of Maryland and City of Baltimore or one organization, such as the Chamber of Commerce, which could do that job, taking a tiny fee out of every loan to pay for the people who run the program.

Compare that model with welfare systems that require hundreds of bureaucrats to hand out money to people who are disincentivized to find a way to escape their impoverished existence.

Baltimore can be saved by the residents of the poorest neighborhoods. Encourage their innate desire to help themselves. Give them a hand instead of a hand out. We’ve tried the other way. It’s time to let the people rescue themselves.

Warren the Ideologue gets it wrong again

Attention Elizabeth Warren supporters. Can you accept the truth that the woman you think is right for America is blinded by her anti-capitalist ideology to facts that don’t suit her model of how the world works?

I pointed out how she fudged the facts with regard to the Trans Pacific Partnership Trade Pact. (See Why Ideologues Make Bad Presidents.) President Obama, who I normally disagree with, is right in criticizing Warren for being wrong on the facts.

Now the Washington Post (not me!) shows that Warren has gotten her facts wrong again–this time when she claims auto dealership markups are costing consumers $26 billion a year. The Post’s Fact Checker gave her four Pinocchios for using bad data to make her argument in favor of ending the excemption car dealers have from supervision by her Consumer Protection Bureau.

Giving the CPB the power to supervise auto loans would raise the cost to consumers as well as tax payers. Consumers would pay more for their loans since there would be yet another layer on top of the existing layers car dealers are required to fill out AND it would result in the CPB hiring an unknown number of enforcers to supervise and penalize car dealers thus increasing the federal budget by a few million a year.

For ideologues like Elizabeth Warren the facts of an issue are less important that the narrative her belief system (ideology) wants to convey. Playing on people’s inclination to believe that business owners will take any opportunity to screw the customer, she will try to impose new layers of regulation that harm consumers in multiple ways without fixing the problem they are supposed to fix.

One thing you can say about Hillary Clinton is that she’s more of a pragmatist than an ideologue. She wets her finger and puts it in the air to see which way the wind of public opinion is going before she decides what she believes. That’s not what we need either.

We need as a president a person with a strong core set of beliefs, but who also understands the American political system requires compromise to work. A presdient should be uncompromising on some issues, starting with the underlying values inherent in the Declaration of Independence and spelled out in the U.S. Constitution. From that base s/he can be compromising where she or he can in order to advance the lives of our citizens while protecting our values on the world stage.

I’m hopeful the Republicans (I’m an Independent) will pick such a candidate to lead their party and this country in 2016.